Close

Not in Melbourne?


Up in the Air

movies|up%20in%20the%20air|2010-01-14
Ryan Bingham, is always on the move, no emotional ties, plenty of in-flight perks. That is until he falls for Alex.

Video

This video cannot be viewed because you either have Javascript turned off, no Flash player or an older version of Flash. Get the latest Flash player

Editorial


George Clooney took one read of the script to say yes to Jason Reitman's follow-up to Juno. He could see the role of a lifetime: a suave yet haunted jet-setter intent on reaching 10 million air-miles as he skips from city to city laying off the workforce on behalf of bosses. He thrives on recession — topical, huh? Yes, but it's worth mentioning the script had been kicking around for six years, and only when the shoot commenced did it take on such cruel relevance.

Bingham has a system for life — he avoids it. He travels perfectly, flitting between meetings in business class. See how neatly he negotiates the hurdles of airport security. Hear his withering put-downs of the herds of clueless travellers. Yes, Up In The Air comes complete with a Clooney voice-over, one of modern cinema's most beguiling pleasures.

Two women will happen to Bingham in different ways. The first, in what seems to be a traditional rom-com, is Vera Farmiga's Alex. She proves his perfect opposite: the Hepburn to his sly-smiled Tracy, the female version of himself. You can see where this is going. Only you can't.

The other female is Natalie, fresh from business school with a computerised plan to downsize the downsizers. An indignant Bingham is forced to show her the ropes. Thus, besides the rom-com, it's also an odd couple flick. Anna Kendrick is the third of the film's marvels.

To counter such movieness, Reitman interviewed 120 recently laid-off workers, sprinkling their candid words amongst the narrative — a Greek chorus of broken lives. He was right about this one — Bingham has all the unguarded desperation of Michael Clayton, but is sexier, funnier and more knowing. He thrives off of the film, as does the film his gift of a performance.


Ian Nathan

Do something with this page

5 User reviews (add yours)

User Feedback

Bob
January 14, 2010


In my opinion this film should not be advertised as "comedy". You think you know where it is going, because it is supposed to be romantic comedy, but the ending defies that expectation, leaving a bad taste. I have no problem with the movie themes, but they are definitely not amusing.

Flag this comment as inappropriate

Mr_Pussy
January 15, 2010


Yes, agree with the bob above. Its not a comedy. Its a take on the reality of corporate obsession and the pay off re the the GFC. cheers

Flag this comment as inappropriate

PeterP
January 24, 2010


An excellent film. Go see it and bear with it. Unfortunately just as it is involving us in the story, it will lose it with yet another aerial shot of the city we are landing at, complete with 1960’s text – it won’t mean much to most of us. Worse than that, it was categorised as a comedy. As the other posts have said, it not. Although the punch lines are there to see from the start, when they do hit they are still thought provoking and even chilling assassinations of the modern views of Independence and Love. We are advised and endlessly told we can and should have both to absolute satisfaction. Whether we are 20 ish (the young assistant) or 50 ish (Clooney). This film is the best I have seen that exposes the myth. If you are in a relationship, or want to be in a relationship, see this film.

Flag this comment as inappropriate

Harry Georgatos
February 04, 2010


This is a light sophisticated movie dealing with real people in an adult manner. Clooney and Vera Farmiga have never been better on film.

Flag this comment as inappropriate

Donna Gee
February 15, 2010


Agree a great film and yep def not a romcom. Although the ending may shock it is predictable but this doesnt take away from the film and its performances. George has never looked better.

Flag this comment as inappropriate

Your Feedback

*Your rating

* required

*Your review (1000 characters max)