The Twilight Saga: New Moon
Video 
Editorial
Let’s assume that you’re going into the second episode of Stephenie Meyer’s vampire saga with an open mind, having been pleasantly surprised that the first film didn’t turn out to be Vampire High School Musical. If that’s the case, you’ll probably enjoy this slice of high melodrama. If not, stay away. This is a series almost entirely lacking in irony, one that takes its central tortured romance too seriously to waste good gazing-soulfully time on filling in the background or winning over naysayers. There’s moping to be done, after all.
That’s not entirely a criticism. To berate the Twilight saga for indulging in moping would be like suggesting that perhaps John McClane and Hans Gruber could have sat down and talked their differences out. This is a series about the all-encompassing, deadly seriousness of first love.
Judged on those terms, while the first Twilight conveyed that feeling of mad romance, the second picks up the theme and snogs it senseless. But in the same way most second superhero movies are about our hero trying to give up the cape, this sequel is about the heartbreak that follows such unthinking passion.
Robert Pattinson’s upright, buttoned-down Edward gives up Kristen Stewart’s Bella for her own good (as it seems to him) and disappears from her life. After turning into a virtual zombie as a result, Bella finds some comfort in the friendship of Jacob (Taylor Lautner), himself afflicted with a searing crush on the self-effacing heroine. Unfortunately, it turns out that’s not the only thing Jacob’s afflicted with, as he starts turning furry and lupine and also abandons Bella for her own protection.
Amid such masculine faffing-about, Bella’s character is the only constant, and she comes across as a little stronger this time around, pulling herself out of the fog of depression and fighting to keep both men in her life — if only in hallucinations in Edward’s case.
Stewart still relies a little too heavily on the tactic of blinking a lot, but then the same could be said of the male leads’ reliance on slight frowns, and all three are doing a good enough job to win over the fans.
Incoming director Chris Weitz, taking over from Catherine Hardwicke, is more reserved and slightly less attuned to his teenage stars, but handles the action well, despite the breakneck production schedule.
While there’s only a hint of humour from the love-triangle members, however, the addition of Jacob’s fellow Wolf Pack members and high vampires the Volturi allow for a little looseness. The latter, especially, threaten to romp away with the film in just moments onscreen. But then, what can you expect when they’re led by Michael Sheen’s deliciously dangerous Aro, and boast a psychic torturer played by Dakota Fanning?
The plethora of shirtless men and general fetishisation of Bella’s love interests may raise a giggle or an eyebrow in audiences more accustomed to seeing women in their scanties, and the pace does sometimes slow to a crawl, but this is another faithful and largely successful adaptation of Meyer’s old-fashioned love story.
Helen O'Hara
User Feedback
Harry Georgatos
November 19, 2009
Not as good as the first one. The sequel isn't bad but somewhere in the middle. The acting in the beginning had some uncomfortable pauses but became better as it progressed into the movie. The film captures the angst and anixety of teenage love even though it's amongst vampires and werewolves. As for me give me Kate Beckinsale in her 2 UNDERWORLD movies.
Lulu
November 19, 2009
GO TEAM EDWARD! good movie! hilerious to watch stupid jacob get shut down all the time! the scene from the voltori didnt happen in the book so that was disapointing! but everything else was really good! robert pattison looked amazing as usual and i loved all the kissing scenes much more than twilight. didnt like jacob trying to kiss bella though! all the reviews saying that bella is a bad role model is stupid if people have actually read all the books she dosnt give up her family when she turns to the immortal life, i hate reviewers that dont know anything about the movies because they dont know anything about the books so shut up! shes a good role model and i would be a vampire in a second if it meant i got to be with robert pattinson hello hes gorgeous. unlike taylor leunt whos ugly!
sam
December 20, 2009
@ lulu, Let me explain something to you, books are books, and moives are movies. Yes, people make movies out of books, but the movie is not ment to be an on screen version of every word you read. For another thing, Bella is a bad role model. She ignores her friends, she uses self harm to have delusions about her ex boyfriend, she shows that she cares more for the now suicidal ex boyfriend than her father and assists in grand theft auto. Clearly a female role model who is strong, independant and doesn't need a man to be happy is old news. Move over inspirational women, here comes Bella Swan, socially inept and mind blowingly dependant on her 108 year old dead boyfriend. Also, just incase you were wondering, i have read the books. Oh and your as likely to become a vampire as you are to become the loch ness monster. I would choose a new life path if I were you. Overall, the movie isn't that bad if your a fan, despite some questionable acting.
Twilight luvahh
December 21, 2009
New moon was much better than twilight. I think the acting was much better in new moon because they got used to the parts they were expected to play. But none of the movies are as good as the books!! Well after reading the books, i think the movies actually stink, but i still love the movies anyway! TEAM JACOB!!
Princess perfect.
December 21, 2009
I agree twilight luvahh. Oh and btw, Robert Pattinson is the most fugliest thing i have ever seen in my life!!! But Taylor Lautner is just OMG!!! HOTTT!!!!!! no offence to Robert Pattinson lovers, but ewww.. TEAM JACOB, deffinetally!
Your Feedback
6 User reviews (add yours)