Close

Not in Melbourne?


The Taking of Pelham 123

movies|the%20taking%20of%20pelham%20123|2009-08-27
Denzel Washington stars as New York City subway dispatcher Walter Garber, whose ordinary day is thrown into chaos by an audacious crime: the hijacking of a subway train. John Travolta stars as Ryder, the criminal mastermind who, as leader of a highly-armed gang of four, threatens to execute the train's passengers unless a large ransom is paid within one hour. As the tension mounts beneath his feet, Garber employs his vast knowledge of the subway system in a battle to outwit Ryder and save the hostages.

Video

This video cannot be viewed because you either have Javascript turned off, no Flash player or an older version of Flash. Get the latest Flash player

Editorial


The original 1974 theatrical feature of the Taking Of Pelham, efficiently directed by Joseph Sargent, starred Walter Matthau and Robert Shaw as a transport cop and his businesslike master-criminal antagonist, talking throughout but only meeting in one scene. A 1998 TV remake stuck close to the film version. Now, Tony Scott and his regular action star Denzel Washington take another run at Godey's solidly constructed story... and come seriously off the rails. Brian Helgeland's script deletes anything from the original film that sticks in the mind and then burdens the main characters with overly complicated backstories.

Washington and Travolta are both ill-served by the suggestion that they can't project characters the way Matthau and Shaw did. Travolta's villain is all over the place, tapping into the stock market figures on his laptop, snarling, "The mayor can lick my bunghole", shooting hostages like a psycho and throwing tantrums that make him seem less dangerous than deranged. Washington is better, though he has to douse his natural charisma to play a put-upon, desk-sitting bureaucrat, and coasts through another flat hero role.

Scott's style, all staccato edits and blurry panic, pays off in a few minor scenes, though it's a pity a sub-plot traffic accident has more impact than the main event. The support get little to do, too: Luis Guzmán as a crooked train driver represents a tradition that versions of this story feature major Hispanic talent; John Turturro strides in as a hostage negotiator as if he's going to lift the film, but gets reduced to whispering tips into the hero's ear; and James Gandolfini blusters without consistency as the mayor.

Implausibility shouldn't be an issue in this sort of thriller, where audiences are willing to suspend disbelief in order to be strung along by suspense.

Kim Newman

Do something with this page

2 User reviews (add yours)

User Feedback

johhny d
September 04, 2009


TOP MOVIE!

Flag this comment as inappropriate

Harry Georgatos
September 04, 2009


No matter how you can disguise these story lines with today's movie technology THE TAKING OF PHELAM 123 belongs more to an audience of the 80's. Story wise this is an ordinary movie with hyped-up kinetic visuals by Tony Scott, with rapid fire editing and a smashing soundtrack. The third act of this movie is a major letdown. Tony Scott made good films in TRUE ROMANCE, ENEMY OF THE STATE, SPYGAME and MAN ON FIRE. PHELAM with it's slick gritty veener offers nothing new that hasn't been seen before. I think Tony Scott should do a CIA paranormal thriller for his next film. I'll watch something like that instead of PHELAM.

Flag this comment as inappropriate

Your Feedback

*Your rating

* required

*Your review (1000 characters max)