The Lovely Bones
Video 
Editorial
The Lovely Bones, Peter Jackson's adaptation of Alice Sebold's surprising best seller, is at least five films in one and therefore the perfect film for these credit crunch times. Over its 135 minute running time — it carries this load lightly — Jackson manages to squeeze in a touching teen romance, a gripping portrait of a serial killer, a family falling apart drama, an expressionistic after-life fantasy, a police procedural flick and, in one gripping set-piece, a fantastic retread of Rear Window.
Jackson may not keep all these multiple plates spinning successfully, but this is bold, daring original filmmaking, with arguably more emotional and intellectual meat to chew on than either the Rings trilogy or Kong.
The Lovely Bones, both book and film, opens with a close-up image of a snowman trapped in a snow globe. The image reverberates around the entire movie. From Susie Salmon sitting on her heavenly gazebo narrating her own life following her brutal murder, to her father Jack (Wahlberg) building intricate model ships inside delicate bottles to her mother Abigail (Weisz) keeping Susie's room in pristine untouched condition to her killer George Harvey (Tucci) carefully tending to his miniature doll house, these are characters looking to build ideal worlds but who eventually become ensnared by them. If this makes Lovely Bones sound like a draining downer, it shouldn't: it is poignant, gripping, emotionally alive and gorgeous.
With its heady teen protagonist and themes of murder intertwined with the fantastical, on paper this felt like Jackson returning to the intimate, small-scale milieu of Heavenly Creatures. Saoirse Ronan may be the nemesis of spell check but she is emerging as a Jodie Foster for the noughties, making Susie spirited, smart, intense and adorable.
Ian Freer
User Feedback
Sean
December 28, 2009
Very disappointing... If you have read the book, I am afraid you may not enjoy the movie. The book was one of the most incredibly emotional and heart-wrenching stories I have ever read; the movie, although well filmed, provided an interpretation of the book that was slow much of the time, lacking the harrowing rawness of brutality juxtaposed on a loving family torn apart. Too much slow motion, not enough of the character development and the human pain so eloquently developed in the book. You might like it if you never read the book... I don't know... I was disappointed.
January 11, 2010
Completely agree with Sean, I have read the book and thought it was brilliant and had been looking forward to seeing the movie. For me, I disliked the 'in-between world' bit - it was too trippy and really un-necessary in my opinion. Im glad I saw the film, but think that more could have been done with it.
Your Feedback
2 User reviews (add yours)