Close

Not in Melbourne?


Surrogates

movies|surrogates|2009-09-24
FBI agents investigate the mysterious murder of a college student linked to the man who helped create a high-tech surrogate phenomenon that allows people to purchase unflawed robotic versions of themselves - fit, good looking remotely controlled machines that ultimately assume their life roles - enabling people to experience life vicariously from the comfort and safety of their own homes. The murder spawns a quest for answers: in a world of masks, who's real and who can you trust?

Video

This video cannot be viewed because you either have Javascript turned off, no Flash player or an older version of Flash. Get the latest Flash player

Editorial


Bruce Willis hasn’t taken the lead in a sci-fi flick since the big, dumb Armageddon (1998) and the vilified and occasionally deified The Fifth Element (1997). Beyond providing an excuse to sometimes wear a creepy wig which Barbie’s boyfriend must want back, why Willis picked the shiny, empty Surrogates as his sci-fi return isn’t clear from the tepid results on screen.

Far from being as good as the many dystopian visions which it weakly echoes (Blade Runner to The Matrix), Surrogates shoots itself in the foot by being based on a flawed idea with more holes than a flyscreen. Screenwriters Michael Ferris and John D. Brancato are on to something when they suggest our tech-obsessed world flirts with rendering human contact obsolete. Sci-fi has always loved being allegorical but Surrogates’ portrait of modern people living their lives through cyborgs - which they remotely control from the safety of special chairs - opens the door to problems it cannot overcome.

As FBI guy Thomas Greer (comatose Willis) and his partner Jennifer Peters (underused Radha Mitchell) investigate the first human murder in years, Surrogates’ internal logic collapses. If you can believe virtual reality has made crime virtually non-existent, how about accepting that people still work in everyday jobs even though their surrogate allegedly lets them “live the dream”?

The Surrogates world is built on such shaky ground, and doesn’t hold up under light scrutiny. To stop us from thinking about what’s going on, Terminator 3 director Jonathan Mostow should have broken out more action, gadgets or intrigue. He doesn’t, so we’re left to plod along on a thrill-less race to thwart a reasonable conspiracy, punctuated by banal baggage and ineffectual Ving Rhames as a rasta Prophet who has to show his nails to the audience whenever he talks. Annoying.

When the moment comes for Willis and Mitchell to possibly save humanity, their rescue plan rivals Independence Day for tech tosh. Surrogates does have something going for at this late stage, though; scenes reminiscent of The Happening emerge – and Surrogates is far less aggravating and pretentious than M. Nigh Shyamalan’s eco-stinker.

Zach Gibson

Do something with this page

1 User review (add yours)

User Feedback

Harry Georgatos
September 25, 2009


An intriguing concept on a bland superficial level. Steals ideas from I, ROBOT to MINORITY REPORT. It's running time is a skimpy 88 minutes. Take out the end credits and your looking at 80 minutes of screen time. As soon as I was settled in the cinema I find myself outside in the foyer. Jonathon Mostow directed TERMINATOR 3 and he's still messing around with robots. This is by no means a failure but could have been so much better.

Flag this comment as inappropriate

Your Feedback

*Your rating

* required

*Your review (1000 characters max)